SUBSCRIBE

Breaking News on Global Meat Trading and Processing

Headlines > Safety & Legislation

Read more breaking news

 

 
News in brief

Judge dismisses pork roll farting lawsuit

Post a comment
Oscar Rousseau

By Oscar Rousseau+

16-Mar-2017
Last updated on 16-Mar-2017 at 12:55 GMT2017-03-16T12:55:09Z

The man is said to have suffered from 'extreme gas and uncomfortable diarrhoea'
The man is said to have suffered from 'extreme gas and uncomfortable diarrhoea'

A discrimination lawsuit filed by a woman in defence of her overweight husband axed from a New Jersey-based pork roll company for excessive flatulence has been dismissed.

Louann Clem, the plaintiff, claimed her husband suffered from “extreme gas and uncomfortable diarrhoea” due to gastric bypass surgery he underwent in 2010 to correct his obesity, according to a court transcript from the US District Court of New Jersey.

The plaintiff alleged her 420-pound husband Richard Clem had been unfairly treated by his employer, Case Pork Roll Company, who dismissed him in 2015 after growing fed up with his continual farting.
'Pain and suffering' 

According to multiple US reports, Louann Clem reportedly quit the company on the day her husband was fired. She duly filed a discrimination lawsuit under the Americans with Disabilities Act, against company president Thomas Dolan and owner Thomas Grieb.

Clem was seeking compensatory damages, punitive damages and liquidated damages for the “emotional pain and suffering” allegedly caused by the defendant, Case Pork Roll Company.

The defamation claim was dismissed by US district court judge Fred Wolfson in July 2015, and a revised version of the lawsuit has performed no better.

Post a comment

Comment title *
Your comment *
Your name *
Your email *

We will not publish your email on the site

I agree to Terms and Conditions

These comments have not been moderated. You are encouraged to participate with comments that are relevant to our news stories. You should not post comments that are abusive, threatening, defamatory, misleading or invasive of privacy. For the full terms and conditions for commenting see clause 7 of our Terms and Conditions ‘Participating in Online Communities’. These terms may be updated from time to time, so please read them before posting a comment. Any comment that violates these terms may be removed in its entirety as we do not edit comments. If you wish to complain about a comment please use the "REPORT ABUSE" button or contact the editors.

Related products

Related suppliers