European Commission refutes animal welfare critics

By Michelle Perrett

- Last updated on GMT

The EC stressed individual member states were responsible for animal welfare
The EC stressed individual member states were responsible for animal welfare

Related tags: European union

The European Commission (EC) has defended itself against accusations that it has been turning a ‘blind eye’ to bad animal transport standards in member states. 

The European Parliament’s Intergroup on the Conservation and Welfare of Animals claimed the consistent failure of states to enforce animal welfare transport regulations needed more action from the EC. It was particularly concerned about the export of live animals to the Middle East, Turkey and Africa.

Intergroup president Janusz Wojciechowski MEP said: “The Commission has a duty to pursue member states that continually flout this legislation and cause immense suffering as a consequence.”

Live animal transport

Meanwhile Dr Alexander Rabitsch presented the findings of his latest report, which claimed the EC is turning a “blind eye”​ to the issue of live animal transport.

However, the EC has refuted the claims.

In a statement to Global Meat News, the Commission said it took the matter “very seriously” ​and was continuing to monitor the situation.

Caution

But it issued a note of caution and said: “It should be remembered that the daily implementation of the EU welfare legislation is primarily under the responsibility of the member states.”

The Commission said it had brought this issue to the attention of member states on several occasions, including a few days ago at a meeting of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed.

It has also taken action presenting information and shared experiences in best practice for slaughter with participants from Lebanon, Turkey, Jordan, Palestine, Egypt and Algeria.

It said: “We are currently evaluating possible long-term follow-up initiatives and we continue, within the remit of our competence, to constantly monitor the situation.”

Related topics: Livestock, Lamb, Poultry, Pork, EU, Beef

Related news

Show more

Related products

The unique natural anti-oxidant for meat applications

The unique natural anti-oxidant for meat applications

Kancor Ingredients Limited | 28-Feb-2019 | Technical / White Paper

Fresh meat is preferred in bright red colour but is highly prone to oxidation and is colour sensitive to extracts. Kancor’s OxiKan R, a highly refined...

Microbiological safety of raw-fermented sausages

Microbiological safety of raw-fermented sausages

Jungbunzlauer | 18-Feb-2019 | Technical / White Paper

Raw-fermented sausages are prone to the contamination with pathogens such as Salmonella and Listeria. Jungbunzlauer gives a new impetus to the exploration...

From trust grows success

From trust grows success

K+G Wetter | 09-Oct-2017 | Data Sheet

The award winning company Wünsch’s Fleischspezialitäten sets new quality standards for meat products – using machines made by K+G Wetter.

Related suppliers

1 comment

Yeah RIGHT 'continuing to monitor' blah blah

Posted by Rebecca Smith,

I don't see how the statement: We take it very seriously and they're going to CONTINUE to monitor (read: do absolutely nothing) the situation - is any kind of refutation at all. INTERGROUP said the EC was turning a blind eye and allowing member states to flout the rules - they replies. nuh UUUH it's serious and we're watchin' 'em. Do they think the words 'monitoring them' is proof they haven't turned a 'blind eye'? Do they realize actions speak, b.s. walks'?
RIGHT - and so then they pass the buck, throw the hot potato, shrug - shake their heads and look clueless with their open mouth dull eyed expressionless cow faces: it should be remembered that the DAILY implementation of the EU welfare legislation is primarily under the responsibility of the member states.

HAHAAAAA OMG sorry, my ultimate favorite line of total SHIT - we are currently evaluating 'possible' 'long-term follow-up initiatives' and we continue, within the remit of our competence (ZER0) to CONSTANTLY MONITOR THE NOT SITUATION.
OK - so NOT REALLY OUR JOB, IT'S THEIRS (on a DAILY basis - so let's all pretend that means it's not our job at all) AND IT'S SERIOUS, AND WE WILL JUST CONTINUE STARING GENERALLY OVER IN THEIR DIRECTION WHILE THEY CONTINUE TO BREAK THE LAW, then we'll talk a lot about nothing, yammer something LONG TERM (meaning? I'LL BE GONE by the time any of this finally happens) FOLLOW-UP (to what? you haven't done anything) INITIATIVES - (HEY !!! Wasn't this entire thing already a legislative initiative?? DO THESE PEOPLE GET PAID FOR THIS CRAP? If so, where do I sign up? At least I'd try to do my job.

Report abuse