Farmers demand action as Trump axe falls on organic meat label

By Oscar Rousseau contact

- Last updated on GMT

Farmers want the Trump administration to reverse the rule change
Farmers want the Trump administration to reverse the rule change
The Trump administration has scrapped a rule that would have improved animal welfare for livestock reared under the ‘USDA Organic’ label, a decision farmers want reversed.

For years, the US has developed organic farming requirements and the Organic Livestock and Poultry Practices (OLPP) rule would have given poultry more space to roam and improved livestock handling and transport conditions for slaughter animals. Instead, the Trump administration has binned it.

Bad practice in the private sector can undermine the USDA Organic label, the NFU said, adding that the US government’s withdrawal of the policy could have a similar effect.

Inconsistent organic certification befogs consumers

Central to the success of the National Organic Program is integrity in the label,​” said the NFU board.
“Despite stakeholder demands for consistency, certifiers have inconsistently applied animal husbandry standards across the industry. Consumer confusion threatens the continued success of the program and the significant investment family farmers have made.​”

Organic certifiers across the US are “inconsistently​” applying animal welfare standards to farming operations, which is damaging the integrity of the USDA Organic label, NFU said. The union wanted the OLPP rule because it could have mitigated consumer concerns around what practices organic farming represent by standardising requirements for livestock and poultry farming at federal level.

USDA organic seal - optimised
The USDA organic seal can be found on products across the country

The OLPP rule enjoys wide industry support from farmers, organic trade organisations and animal welfare advocacy groups.

In response to an earlier government request for comment on its proposal to axe the policy, 47,000 comments were submitted to the USDA. Of those, 99% were in favour of retaining the rule, according to the Organic Trade Association.

It claimed demand for food produced to higher standards is growing domestically, with sales of organic food in the US surpassing US$43bn in 2016. And the rule would have made it easier for consumers to make informed purchasing decisions on organic food because farming practices would be standardised, it said.

The maintenance of high standards for the organic program is essential for the continuance of consumer confidence and the economic viability of the program for family farmers,​” said the NFU board. “We urge USDA to make the Organic Livestock and Poultry Practices rule effective immediately.​”

The USDA could not be reached for comment at the time of going to press.

Related news

Show more

Related product

From trust grows success

From trust grows success

K+G Wetter | 09-Oct-2017 | Data Sheet

The award winning company Wünsch’s Fleischspezialitäten sets new quality standards for meat products – using machines made by K+G Wetter.

Related suppliers

1 comment

Animal Welfare

Posted by Chris,

So why don't farmers, transporters and slaughterhouses proceed (or continue) with improved animal welfare practices anyway? Get the details of the (organic) "brands" out on social and general media and word will get around which brands to buy and the public will know which brands still use cruel and inhumane practices. Allow free "public inspection" of the organic farms - don't just sit back and say Don won't let us do this, that or the other.

Alternatively - publicly shame USDA on social and general media - not just on "Global Meat". Get the names of those involved in the public arena.

Report abuse

Post your comment

We will not publish your email address on the website

These comments have not been moderated. You are encouraged to participate with comments that are relevant to our news stories. You should not post comments that are abusive, threatening, defamatory, misleading or invasive of privacy. For the full terms and conditions for commenting see clause 7 of our Terms and Conditions ‘Participating in Online Communities’. These terms may be updated from time to time, so please read them before posting a comment. Any comment that violates these terms may be removed in its entirety as we do not edit comments. If you wish to complain about a comment please use the "REPORT ABUSE" button or contact the editors.