Meat taxation put forward once again

By Aidan Fortune contact

- Last updated on GMT

Proposals to place a tax on red and processed meat have been put forward by the University of Oxford
Proposals to place a tax on red and processed meat have been put forward by the University of Oxford
Meat tax. Two words to strike fear into the hearts of an industry cropped up again this week.

A report from the University of Oxford in England put forward proposals that a tax on red and processed meats would be introduced by the government and that it would “save lives and reduce healthcare costs​”.

Although these proposals were put to governments all over the world, the report suggested that a 14% tax on red meat and a 79% tax on processed meat would save the UK Government £700m a year in healthcare costs.

Unsurprisingly, the meat industry in the UK hit back at these proposals. Dr Carrie Ruxton, member of the Meat Advisory Panel, told sister title Food Manufacture​ that the proposals were “ill-advised”​ and “would be like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut”​.

Also feeling that the proposal is over the top, the Association of Independent Meat Suppliers (AIMS) raised the point that the meat industry needed to showcase itself more positively to help battle these proposals.

“Beyond the need to counterbalance negative and misguided perceptions, AIMS also sees a wider need to positively promote the sale of British meat to the British market, whilst advocating the skilled, valued and important work done across the supply chain​,” said an AIMS spokesperson.

Of course, this is not the first time a meat tax has been proposed. Last year, Germany’s Federal Environment Agency urged that taxes on animal products should be raised from 7% to 19%. In this case, the agency proposed the increased tax due to the perceived impact of agriculture on climate change. When proposed, Environment Minister Barbara Hendricks, member of the SPD party, and Minister of Food Christian Schmidt, who was also a member of the Christian Social Union (CSU), were quoted in the press as being against the increased tax.

Hendricks said: "These are the proposals of the Federal Environment Agency, not those of the Ministry of the Environment, and I do not think much of some of the individual measures contained in them.​" While Schmidt added: "I do not want to dictate to the citizens by punitive taxes what comes to the table.”

There hasn’t been much talk of a meat tax in Germany since then.

In 2016, think tank Danish Council of Ethics suggested a tax on beef​, also due to climate change. Although focusing on beef, it proposed that all ‘climate-damaging’ food items should be taxed. However this has not progressed further than the proposal stage in the country.

Also in 2016, animal rights campaign group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) called for a meat tax in the US​ via a publicity stunt involving nuns outside the Republican Party National Convention. Given President Trump’s love of fast food, particularly McDonald’s, the appeal seems to have fallen on deaf ears however PETA is still campaigning for the levy claiming it would help to reduce the US’ annual health care costs.

Sweden has also had plenty of meat tax supporters in the past. In 2015, an environmental campaign group Swedish Food and Environment Information (SMMI) started a petition​ to introduce a tax on meat. This was two years after the Swedish Board of Agriculture’s proposal was shot down by the Government. At the time of the 2015 petition, even a SMMI spokesman said there was a “low possibility”​ of it happening but recognised the importance of raising political awareness.

Regardless of the reason why the meat tax was proposed, these efforts do have something in common – they all failed to get off the ground. That doesn’t mean it won’t be successful one day somewhere as all it will take is the right argument, framed in the right way at the right time for a Government to move forward with it. It wasn’t so long ago that a levy on soft drinks in the UK would have been laughed at but it is now in effect and manufacturers have had to move quickly to reformulate their products to avoid being hit.

The global meat industry is unlikely to want be put in the same position in which they have to adapt their products or be faced with increased taxation, especially when margins are tight enough as it is.

Related news

Show more

Related products

The unique natural anti-oxidant for meat applications

The unique natural anti-oxidant for meat applications

Kancor Ingredients Limited | 28-Feb-2019 | Technical / White Paper

Fresh meat is preferred in bright red colour but is highly prone to oxidation and is colour sensitive to extracts. Kancor’s OxiKan R, a highly refined...

Microbiological safety of raw-fermented sausages

Microbiological safety of raw-fermented sausages

Jungbunzlauer | 18-Feb-2019 | Technical / White Paper

Raw-fermented sausages are prone to the contamination with pathogens such as Salmonella and Listeria. Jungbunzlauer gives a new impetus to the exploration...

From trust grows success

From trust grows success

K+G Wetter | 09-Oct-2017 | Data Sheet

The award winning company Wünsch’s Fleischspezialitäten sets new quality standards for meat products – using machines made by K+G Wetter.

Related suppliers


What Nonsense From The Politicised Vegan Community

Posted by Deborah Mallender,

Oh no you don't, D3 even in supplement form comes from Lanolin an animal by product, whilst B12 is also derived from animal products whether in supplement form or not. Without these vitamins our immunity will become shot and the increase burden on the NHS enormous. Further and clearly the highly political and wholly wrong vegan assertions about the role of animal life in global warming is contrary to fact. Fact - it is human use of fossil fuels which have increased gasses. Poland is still belching out gasses derived from coal and China is laden with smog. For the vegans to attack the natural world and our food is bizarre. If the whole world turned vegan tomorrow our food would have to be produced under plastic, the natural world would be decimated and natural fertiliser none existent. What then a future world of political control by our vegan masters who eat meat on the quiet to keep themselves healthy, while others are starved of essential nutrition. What a scary thought.

Report abuse

Methane/carbon tax coming for meat and dairy sooner than you think

Posted by Stuart,

Beef cattle and dairy cows belch huge volumes of methane (out their mouths as well their rears and in their manure) and this greenhouse gas is 25X more effective than carbon dioxide at causing climate change and global warming.

So, yes, dairy cows and cattle should get a tax, and it should be a methane tax that is 25X higher than the carbon tax - otherwise, the beef and dairy industries get an unfair subsidy.

With every warming year, this tax gets closer and closer. Sadly, as these farm animals are a major cause of climate change, we'll probably get lots of delaying actions by the dairy/beef lobby that will end up allowing climate change to get worse.

What might be better is that the beef/dairy lobby push for a tax on all meat and methane products that gradually rises over time, allowing consumers to get used to the higher prices. Rebate of all methane/carbon taxes to the consumer will enable them to continue consuming dairy and beef (if they want).

If I was working in this industry or owned a business, I would be very concerned about keeping my job. I would also be very concerned about the ethics involved in lobbying against a methane/carbon tax. As a business owner, I would be thinking of selling out before everyone tries to exit at once.

Because when the tipping point comes, consumers are going to be very upset at the dairy beef lobby foot dragging holding back action against climate change. Maybe it's time you become part of the solution, instead of being the main source of the problem?

Report abuse

Follow us


View more