Most EU countries not convinced of meat ingredients origin labelling

By Carmen Paun, in Brussels

- Last updated on GMT

Related tags: European union

Would the benefits justify the costs?
Would the benefits justify the costs?
Many European Union (EU) countries are unsure whether imposing mandatory labelling requirements for the country of origin of meat used as ingredient in processed food products would bring benefits that justify the costs, a meeting of EU agriculture ministers in Brussels yesterday (24 March) revealed.

Germany, the UK, Ireland, Luxembourg, Spain, Romania and the Czech Republic were opposed to any new legislative measure asking food manufacturers to print on the label of a food product the country of origin of the meat included in it.

"I do not believe a legislative proposal is justified, as the costs are not proportional to the benefits and existing voluntary schemes have been shown to work well for UK consumers,"​ said British food minister George Eustice during the EU Council of Ministers (Agriculture) meeting in Brussels.

The debate was a response to the European Commission December 2013 report on the mandatory indication of the country of origin or provenance for meat ingredients, which was sparked by last year’s horsemeat scandal. The report shows that while consumers would want to have more information on the provenience of the meat in food products, they would not be prepared to pay for it.

The European Commission estimated that including a mandatory origin requirement for meat ingredient inputs would increase the operating costs of food manufacturers by 15% on average.

Indeed, Romanian Agriculture Minister Daniel Constantin claimed the costs could go as high as 50%, based on information he received from the Romanian meat processing industry.

Other EU countries such as France, Italy, Finland, Latvia, Austria and Estonia wanted a more thorough technical report on the actual costs of mandatory origin labelling. France proposed that a group of experts be formed inside the EU Council of Ministers to further analyse the issue and see how the EU could respond to consumer demands for information without increasing the operating costs for providing it.

Three EU member states proved staunch supporters of mandatory legislation of country-of-origin labelling for meat used as an ingredient. The Netherlands, Malta and Sweden said consumers should be given the necessary information to make an informed decision, while keeping the costs for business as low as possible.

The EU Health Commissioner Tonio Borg said he would take into consideration yesterday’s debate and the opinion of the European Parliament before deciding to propose any new law. "We don’t know who would absorb the costs – and just as there is no such a thing as a free lunch, there is no such a thing as free labelling,"​ he said, underlying one more time the expected high costs to be incurred by businesses as a result of such legislation.

Related news

Show more


Ireland's position

Posted by Raymond O' Rourke,

It is incorrect to say Ireland was against mandatory labelling - rather they were undecided. They supported the idea of having refined figures from the Commission to estimate the cost of mandatory origin labelling and stated that they supported the principle of consumer information but that industry's concerns should be also taken into account. The UK on the other hand was totally against the measure saying voluntary origin labelling was sufficient.

Report abuse

Country of origin labelling.

Posted by beefeater,

In this day and age with information technology systems this rejection is BS. Farm of Origin trace-back at Harvest is mandatory for meat to enter International or inter- Country trade. Therefore what is good for the farmer, should be good for the trader/ processor. After all it is just the Country not the individual farm source labelling.If horse meat can enter the food chain as beef, lack of trace-back protocols only allows the unscrupulous to be anonymous

Report abuse

Follow us


View more