WHO call to ban antibiotics ‘wrong’

By Oscar Rousseau contact

- Last updated on GMT

Reducing on-farm antibiotic use could 'jeopardise' animal health, the NPPC claim
Reducing on-farm antibiotic use could 'jeopardise' animal health, the NPPC claim

Related tags: Medicine

The World Health Organization’s (WHO) call to stop farmers and the food industry from using powerful antibiotics preventatively is “wrong” and “ill-advised”, a US trade body has said.

Guidelines from the global health body suggesting farmers should stop using antibiotics for growth and disease prevention have been strongly criticised by the National Pork Producers Council (NPPC).

Denying pigs, cows and chickens necessary antibiotics would be unethical and immoral, leading to animal suffering and possibly death, and could compromise the nation’s food system,​” the trade body said in a statement.

The rebuke comes after the WHO warned overuse and misuse of antibiotics on farms globally was contributing to rising levels of antibiotic resistance. Lack of antibiotics effective for treating medical conditions in people could be “as serious a security threat as a sudden and deadly disease outbreak​”, said Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of WHO.

WHO’s plan would cause animal harm

The NPPC said it shared the concerns of the health organisation, but rejected plans recommending a scale-back of the meat industry’s use of a number of antibiotics. These include quinolones, cephalosporins, macrolides and ketolides, glycopeptides and colistin.

“The US pork industry’s goal is to reduce the need for antibiotics and it has devoted time and resources to that end, including adopting good antibiotic stewardship practices and studying alternatives to antibiotics,​” said the NPPC.

Simply reducing on-farm uses of antibiotics, as the WHO suggests, however, likely would have no effect on public health and would jeopardise animal health. Its call for stopping the use of antibiotics that are critically important in human medicine for treating infected animals is antithetical to pork farmers’ and veterinarians’ moral obligation to care for their pigs.​”

Use of antibiotics in the US pork sector is compliant with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) directives that prohibit firms from using antibiotics important to human medicine for growth promotion purposes.

Industry experts also support federal efforts to track antibiotic resistance in foodborne bacteria from humans, retail meat and animals produced for food

Related news

Show more

1 comment

Choices...

Posted by Bob,

Hmmm... save some pigs destined for slaughter some theoretical additional suffering on their way to the stunner (and make some Bux along the way) or take a shot at saving hundreds / thousands / millions of our fellow humans from severe harm or horrible death... hmmm... which to choose... which to choose...
From a microbiologist and former meat plant manager.

Report abuse

Post your comment

We will not publish your email address on the website

These comments have not been moderated. You are encouraged to participate with comments that are relevant to our news stories. You should not post comments that are abusive, threatening, defamatory, misleading or invasive of privacy. For the full terms and conditions for commenting see clause 7 of our Terms and Conditions ‘Participating in Online Communities’. These terms may be updated from time to time, so please read them before posting a comment. Any comment that violates these terms may be removed in its entirety as we do not edit comments. If you wish to complain about a comment please use the "REPORT ABUSE" button or contact the editors.